Before concentrating on personal injury and workers' compensation, Marc Trent litigated across the full spectrum of federal practice — appellate courts, civil RICO, major institutional disputes, technology litigation, and international matters.

Federal litigation demands documentation precision, strategic anticipation, and appellate-quality record-building that most state court practice does not. An attorney trained to argue before the Seventh Circuit — where every factual assertion must be supported, every expert opinion grounded in identified methodology, every argument foreclosed by the opposing brief — brings those standards to every case they handle afterward.
When Marc Trent evaluates a personal injury file, he applies the same analytical framework he used in federal court: how will the defense attack this? What gaps exist in the documentation? What arguments have we not yet foreclosed? That habit of anticipation produces files that are harder to attack, settlements that are stronger, and trial credibility that changes the insurer's calculation.
Argued before the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in complex federal matters. Federal appellate advocacy at the highest level — building records designed to survive appellate review from the first document in the trial court.
Litigated civil RICO matters in federal district court across multiple stages of proceedings. RICO litigation requires the most rigorous factual development and the most precise pattern-of-conduct analysis in federal practice.
Litigated and achieved a favorable settlement in a civil matter against the Chicago Bears, one of the most prominent sports franchises in the country, navigating substantial institutional defense resources across multiple litigation stages.
Handled matters against major technology companies involving Section 230 platform liability and digital rights. Deep analytical understanding of how large technology platforms construct and deploy institutional defenses — and where those defenses fail under sustained legal pressure.
Represented plaintiffs in federal discrimination and retaliation proceedings against a major Illinois university across multiple stages of district court litigation. Complex institutional defendant, detailed evidentiary development, expert coordination.
Appeared pro hac vice in the Delaware Court of Chancery — among the most sophisticated business courts in the United States — and handled matters spanning multiple countries and jurisdictions, bringing international litigation perspective to domestic practice.